I already wrote about such "trend". Why did you consider such "trend" as season rising or something else? So I consider "10%" just to make "necessary picture" and this number is not representative. P.S. You can block anybody in this list if you don't like the true. I think it's completely clear to all people what is happening here. 01.07.2015, 11:34, "Gert Doering" <gert@space.net>:
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 11:19:51AM +0300, Petr Umelov wrote:
If you go here https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2015-01 you can read next:
To put this into perspective, the RIPE NCC has allocated about 6,100 /22s from 185/8. In the past six months, the average rate has been around 245 allocations per month. Therefore, the transfers which the policy proposal tries to discourage constitute about 10% of the total allocations in recent months.
Why do you calculate the part of transfers for last 6 months when /8 is allocated earlier and the part of transfer for HOLE /8 is only 3%?
Because, as has been demonstrated to you, this trend has a clear upward curve - and the absolute numbers do not really matter if specific behaviour is seen that the community does not want.
Your attempt to argue with the small numbers seen so far has been made in the review phase, and didn't have the desired effect then. So, it is not a *new* argument.
So, please stop now, or you WILL be moderated.
Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-- With best regards, Vladimir Andreev General director, QuickSoft LLC Tel: +7 903 1750503