Hi, On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 09:46:55AM +0200, Tore Anderson wrote:
That said, I don't know if APWG have any influence on the NCC's charging scheme at all. Is it possible for this policy to say something along the lines of «joining the NCC and obtaining a PA allocation from the last /8 should cost approximately the same per address as obtaining a PI assignment from the last /8»? Is that in scope of address policy?
APWG can voice an opinion, but that has no legal binding - the fees are decided (voted!) by the paying members in the RIPE NCC general meeting (AGM). So while the NCC board may listen to us (and usually does), and propose a corresponding fee structure, if the members vote against it, APWG has no way to force anything. Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279