HI, On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 04:48:33PM +0000, boggits wrote:
On 21 March 2011 16:43, Emilio Madaio <emadaio@ripe.net> wrote:
We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to <address-policy-wg@ripe.net> before 18 April 2011.
Since we've had a joyful time with this proposal before,
It's actually a new and revised one :-) - which purposely only covers global policy, and none of the fun bits about local rules for returning address space or transfers.
what happens if we pass it *but* ICANN fail to get the IANA contract this time round?
Since the proposal doesn't actually talk that much about *ICANN* (except for initial adoption of this policy), I'm not sure if we have a problem here - if the ICANN function is moved elsewhere, this policy will go with it. The only problematic bit is timing, that is, we take half a year to finish reaching consensus, and right in the middle the IANA function is no longer at ICANN. When is the contract renewal due? Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- did you enable IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279