14 Sep
2015
14 Sep
'15
12:14 p.m.
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015, at 09:33, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
I would be interested in getting an educated guess what would happen if we went with the following policy:
You get /20 to /24 depending on need/want instead of /22 for everybody.
This would apply until we have last-/10 where we then go to /22-/24 depending on need/want. We would treat recovered pool the same as last /8, it's just treated as "addresses" so /10 is "/10 worth of adresses".
Point taken and thanks for the feedback. Good to see some people looking at more than /22 in one shot.
My goal is still to have IPv4 addresses according to this policy by 2020.
:) -- Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN fr.ccs