David, Fully agree and support your suggestion. Let's move on. Regards, Jordi ---- Original Message ---- From: "David Kessens" <david@iprg.nokia.com> To: "Laura Cobley" <laura@ripe.net> Cc: <address-policy-wg@ripe.net> Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 1:46 AM Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
Laura,
On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 10:36:40AM +0200, Laura Cobley wrote:
During the following discussions, the RIPE NCC was asked to co-ordinate work on clarifying the text. Please note that we do not intend to propose any policy changes.
During the meeting, I asked you not to waste your time on this. Since the policy is already changing in the other regions, our time would be better spend to move forwards, instead of stalling the policy development process by spending time on 'clarifications'.
I would like to ask the working group whether we can ask the RIPE NCC to summarize the different changes made to the policy in the other regions, so that we can have a discussion on which changes are appropriate.
Thanks,
David Kessens ---
********************************** Madrid 2003 Global IPv6 Summit Presentations and videos on line at: http://www.ipv6-es.com This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.