Dear Adrian, I think this subject was covered on this list earlier this year in the thread named; “Guidance Requested: Changing the Status of PI Address Space”. I’m just not sure what the status is right now? I not sure too about status, but ready to work in working group if it already exist. Could someone update about current status? -- Alexey Ivanov 09.10.2013 11:19 - Adrian Hardy написал(а): Hi all, I think this subject was covered on this list earlier this year in the thread named; “Guidance Requested: Changing the Status of PI Address Space”. I’m just not sure what the status is right now? Do we really need to restart the discussion? Regards, Adrian e-Quest | Adrian Hardy Technical Consultant T: +31 492 392626 | Support: +31 492 780780 Schootense Dreef 26 | 5708 HZ | Helmond KVK:17121883 | BTW:8009998348B01 | [1]http://www.e-quest.nl Van: address-policy-wg-bounces@ripe.net [mailto:address-policy-wg-bounces@ripe.net] Namens ksyu@netassist.ua Verzonden: woensdag 9 oktober 2013 01:35 Aan: address-policy-wg@ripe.net Onderwerp: [address-policy-wg] New Policy Proposal (PI - PA Transfer) Hello everybody I would like to draw attention of the public to the next moment . According to the RIPE policy, a PI network should be used only as it was assigned. However, the time comes, the amount of clients increases, the number of services is growing up, and v4 addresses are not assigned any more. What should provider do in this case? The network was assigned for the particular service and can't be used for other services? Just returned back . But no one in their right mind will do this ) . It may be a topical solution for this situation - to return the opportunity to transfer PI blocks into the PA? This will give the opportunity to breathe more freely, not to violate the rules of RIPE policy . I suggest to discuse the question of transference of PI blocks to PA, and invite all caring to speak on the matter. Best regards, Kseniya Sokol [1] http://www.e-quest.nl
