Hi Marcin, On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Marcin Kuczera <marcin@leon.pl> wrote:
These /48s can be (sub-)allocated to customers (please forgive my flawed internet-numbers-delegation-vocabulary), who are free to announce them over BGP sessions.
Indeed, however there is one "little" issue. /32 is already advertised @AS13000 as whole.
So there are 2 possibilities: - add paralel route objects, but then MNT-LOWER must be added and all related inter-ISP communiaction problems. - not adverising /32 @ AS13000, adverising only prefixes in use.
3: - at 50 EUR/year/customer, retrieve 1 PIv6 prefix, per customer.
Presumably, the more ISPs that sign up for this Internet tax (the LIR membership fees), the lower it will become (#LIRs is most definitely sub-linearly proportional to the RIPE NCC:s operational costs). It is fairly obvious to me that this attempt to (at least partially) solve a *perceived* network model problem with taxes is not long-term stable in itself.*
You can't use this argument for people who earn around 500-1000 euro per month with their business... Post comunistic block is much different than old EU, and most people from old EU do not realize that...
To which I wonder, how painful is 50 EUR/year per business ("additional fees may apply"), to bring its own prefix to someone else's hosting/network infrastructure? Regards, Martin