16 Jan
2008
16 Jan
'08
3:54 p.m.
On Jan 16, 2008 2:09 PM, Marco Hogewoning <marcoh@marcoh.net> wrote: [...]
Not a bad proposal, but where does this actually differ from becoming a LIR, except for a change in minimum allocation sizes ?
This was the point I was trying to raise at the last RIPE meeting. I think it may make sense to make a scalable policy that doesn't have a distinction between LIRs and enterprises. The border between the two is porous and a policy that doesn't assume LIRs being significantly larger than enterprises may be called for. I would suggest that instead of two policies we should have one. http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-55/presentations/vegoda-v6-policy.pdf Thoughts? Leo Vegoda