I'm firmly in the +1 "the text matches the original intent as I have always understood the policy, and we should go there" camp.
Ian
-----Original Message-----
From: address-policy-wg <address-policy-wg-bounces@ripe.net> On Behalf Of JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg
Sent: 19 March 2018 17:05
To:
Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2018-01 New Policy Proposal (Organisation-LIR Clarification in IPv6 Policy)
Thanks Gert!
Further, having no inputs removes all the fun of the PDP!
In case you missed previous emails, to make it easier for you to comment, I've prepared an on-line diff so you can easily track the proposed changes:
https://www.diffchecker.com/2mGPoRbo
Also, the complete text of the proposal is here:
https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2018-01
Now folks don't have any excuse to not comment ;-)
Regards,
Jordi
-----Mensaje original-----
De: address-policy-wg <address-policy-wg-bounces@ripe.net> en nombre de Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
Fecha: lunes, 19 de marzo de 2018, 16:48
Para: Marco Schmidt <mschmidt@ripe.net>
CC: <address-policy-wg@ripe.net>
Asunto: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2018-01 New Policy Proposal (Organisation-LIR Clarification in IPv6 Policy)
Dear AP WG,
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 03:34:25PM +0100, Marco Schmidt wrote:
> A new RIPE Policy proposal, 2018-01, "Organisation-LIR Clarification in IPv6 Policy" is now available for discussion.
This policy proposal was prompted by the discussion at the last RIPE
meeting, where the NCC brought up the issue that the IPv6 allocation policy
talks about "organization" without ever defining what that is - "one LIR
account", "one legal organization" (which can hold multiple LIR accounts),
etc.
Jordi volunteered to clean up the text, and here's the proposed changes
- but without some feedback from *you*, we can't clean this up.
[..]
> We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to <address-policy-wg@ripe.net> before 23 March 2018.
Thus: feedback please.
Like
- "the text matches the original intent as I have always understood the
policy, and we should go there"
- "this is not my understanding of the original policy, because ..."
- "never touch a working policy!"
- "I do not see this as a big problem, but the new text works for me"
Gert Doering
-- APWG chair
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.consulintel.es
The IPv6 Company
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
Disclaimer
This email is private and may be confidential and is intended for the recipient only. If misdirected please notify us by telephone and return and confirm that it has been deleted from your system and any copies destroyed.
If you are not the intended recipient you are strictly prohibited from using, printing, copying, distributing or disseminating this email or any information within it.
We use reasonable endeavours to virus scan all emails leaving our organisation but no warranty is given that this email and any attachments are virus free. You should undertake your own virus checking.
The right to monitor email communication through our networks is reserved by us.