4 Feb
2019
4 Feb
'19
5:30 p.m.
On Mon, 4 Feb 2019 at 12:04, Marco Schmidt <mschmidt@ripe.net> wrote:
This proposal aims to reduce the IPv4 allocation size to a /24 once the RIPE NCC is unable to allocate contiguous /22 ranges.
Is it worth having a period of handing out two or three (potentially non-contiguous) /24s when the last complete /22 disappears, before moving to just a single /24 (with a step at 2 if we start at 3)? I can see the logic between the change in sizes, I'm just wondering if there was a case for intermediatory steps to reduce the pain Either way, I support the proposal with or without this change Thx J -- James Blessing 07989 039 476