15 Oct
2008
15 Oct
'08
5:42 p.m.
I wonder why this policy doesn't require the LIRs to have an IPv6 allocation before they apply for one of the last few IPv4 blocks? Is there any good reason to give out one of the last IPv4 blocks to an LIR which has no intention of deploying IPv6? In other words, if the policy is intended to only provide enough IPv4 resources to ease the transition, shouldn't the policy also require that the LIR has taken the basic step of getting an IPv6 allocation? It would also be nice if the policy had a clearer statement about this being a quota or rationing system. --Michael Dillon