Hi Martin,
You miss the next sentence of the legal advise: "In the absence of such legislation, a court cannot order the revocation of certificates."
I think the legal statement (when read as a whole, not cherry-picking the parts you like) was clear enough. Sander
Now if the statement could only guarantee for the future that it no court could do anything of the sort, it'd actually be useful. Since it doesn't, I think the sensible thing to do is to account for the fact that laws can change
I fully agree. Mind you, they could just as well just make a law that says "You may not route any packets to/from addresses that appear on list X" and we would have exactly the situation everyone seems to be afraid of, and it doesn't need RPKI. As soon as laws don't allow 'your network, your rules' anymore then anything can happen... But that is something that we'll have to steer through voting, not address policy :) - Sander