4 Dec
2008
4 Dec
'08
12:17 p.m.
On Thu, 4 Dec 2008, Andy Davidson wrote:
On 3 Dec 2008, at 10:48, Andrei Robachevsky wrote:
But meeting the "Contractual requirements" is more difficult, since in a way that will require the RIPE NCC to have a contract with ourselves and to evaluate our own request. Perhaps a more elegant solution here would be the one proposed by Remco back in November (to establish a policy that lets the NCC file a request in the ordinary way).
Does "The RIPE Community" exist as a legal entity ? Can the community hold the meeting resources and agree to hold a contract with the NCC ?
No, and No. That is one of the reasons that back in 1992 the 'RIPE Community' decided to create the RIPE NCC.
Andy
Rob