On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 02:49:24PM +0200, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
2. /32 vs. /48 V6 prefix - routability aspect
There are incorrect documents published which suggest that filtering at /32 is ok. After changing these documents and waiting some time this should no longer be an issue.
Agreed. We're still in early stages.
3. /32 vs. /48 V6 prefix - address conservation aspect
There is no question that a /32 is quite a big block and that this sacrifice to "ensure" reachability from most network places is worth it.
There is at least a question here, even if we agree on the answer.
However, it's not simply whether it's worth it or not, it's a question of doing the right thing. If we start changing allocation policies to accommodate laziness on the part of router operators, where does it end?
Agreed too. Sorry for such "agreed!" mails without more content, but when trying to find consensus, also expressed agreement is necessary. :-) Regards, Daniel -- CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr@cluenet.de -- dr@IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0