24 May
2011
24 May
'11
9:17 a.m.
Am Tue, 24 May 2011 08:13:54 +0200 schrieb Roger Jørgensen <rogerj@gmail.com>:
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Daniel Suchy <danny@danysek.cz> wrote: <snip>
...
I think you might missed the same fine point I did... RIPE NCC can still return addresses to IANA and those addresses will not fall in under the /8 rule?
If IANA in such a case redistributes resources to the RIR, e.g. RIPE NCC, they will fall under the /8 policy as it is right now. BTW, I do support the proposal. Regards, Andreas -- Andreas Schachtner afs Holding GmbH communication technologies & solutions http://afs-com.de/ Geschaeftsfuehrer Andreas Schachtner HRB 15448, Amtsgericht Dortmund