salut Riccardo,


I do not totally agree with you.. and I explain why.


you are talking about the case in the future.. but I give an actual example..


2 years ago my company has an allocated prefix from a LIR. After 1 year we asked additional resources and had a negative response because of the RIPE Policy limitations. after the next year the situation was the same and to receive an additional prefix we became LIR. Now, pls answer... why to not permit transfer from the old LIR to the new one if they agree on it and do it for ensure the new LIR in continuity of the prefix use (all this with condition that this prefix was allocated by the old LIR when the new LIR has the status OTHER).




Best Regards,


-

Sergiu IANCIUC

SC ITNS.NET SRL


MD-2068, Moldova

or. Chisinau, str. Miron Costin 3/1

tel.: +373 22 877 877

fax : +373 22 44 11 73

mobile: +373 690 22 111

url: http://www.itns.md


Save a tree... Don't print this email unless you have to...





Saturday, April 30, 2016, 8:33:49 AM, you wrote:



Dear Sergiu,

about your example and its eventual realtionship with the proposal 2015-05:

Company X would have not limit in receive address space as described in transfert or allocation policies.

The limit described in 2015-05 would be applied to the LIR that assigned space to Company X and, as described in your example, later transfered the space in Company X registry.

This LIR is supposed to not need address space as it moved it outside its registry so it would not be able to request an additional /22 allocation from pool outside 185/8 standing on 2015-05 proposal


On the other hand if Company X after its sing up as a new LIR after 18 months need more space and there is enough space outside 185/8  would be able to request an additional /22 standing on  2015-05 proposal. The LIR that offered the first /22 to Company X as  "assigned resource" could also request an additional /22 allocation if its registry is holding less than a /20 IPv4.


hope this help

regards

Riccardo


Il 29/04/2016 10:38, Sergiu IANCIUC ha scritto:

hello,


PLS, take in consideration the situation


Company  X  has  a  /22 from its LIR. The LIR can not offer more IPv4 

spaces   and the Company X becomes a LIR to satisfy its needs. Now, it 

is logical that the LIR (if agreed between these 2 LIRs) transfers the 

space  allocated  to the Company X (now the new LIR) AND THIS have to 

not be the part from the policy -


"requirements,  such  as  the LIR has not transferred any IPv4 address 

space before."


What are you thinking about?



Best Regards,



-

Sergiu IANCIUC

SC ITNS.NET SRL



MD-2068, Moldova

or. Chisinau, str. Miron Costin 3/1

tel.: +373 22 877 877

fax : +373 22 44 11 73

mobile: +373 690 22 111

url: http://www.itns.md



Save a tree... Don't print this email unless you have to...









This is a forwarded message

From: Marco Schmidt <mschmidt@ripe.net>

To: ncc-announce@ripe.net

Date: Friday, April 29, 2016, 11:18:23 AM

Subject: [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE Policy Proposals - April Update



===8<==============Original message text===============

Dear colleagues,


Here is our monthly overview of open policy proposals and their stage in 

the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP).


If you wish to join the discussion about a particular proposal, please 

do so on the relevant working group mailing list.


Proposals Open for Discussion:

2015-05, "Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria"


Proposals Awaiting Input:

2015-04, "RIPE Resource Transfer Policies"

2016-01, "Include Legacy Internet Resource Holders in the Abuse-c Policy"



Proposal Overviews:


PROPOSAL: 2015-05, "Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria"

OVERVIEW: Aims to allow LIRs to request an additional /22 IPv4 

allocation from the RIPE NCC every 18 months. The latest version of the 

proposal suggests several requirements, such as the LIR cannot hold more 

than a /20 IPv4, must document their IPv6 deployment and has not 

transferred any IPv4 address space before.

STATUS: Discussion Phase

WHERE TO COMMENT: Address Policy Working Group: address-policy-wg@ripe.net

DEADLINE: 13 May 2016

FULL PROPOSAL: https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2015-05


=====


The following proposals are awaiting input before they can go any 

further in the PDP.


PROPOSAL: 2015-04, "RIPE Resource Transfer Policies"

OVERVIEW: Aims to create a single transfer policy with all relevant 

information on the transfer of Internet number resources, replacing text 

in several RIPE Policies. The proposal also introduces a 24-month 

holding period for IPv4 addresses and 16-bit ASNs after any change of 

holdership.

RIPE NCC IMPACT ANALYSIS: Includes the point how the 24-month holding 

period for scarce resources will be applied.

STATUS: Review Phase – Awaiting decision from working group chair

FULL PROPOSAL: https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2015-04


PROPOSAL: 2016-01, "Include Legacy Internet Resource Holders in the 

Abuse-c Policy"

OVERVIEW: Aims for a mandatory abuse contact for Legacy Internet 

Resource holders in the RIPE Database.

STATUS: Discussion Phase – Awaiting decision from proposer

FULL PROPOSAL: https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2016-01



The RIPE NCC provides an overview of current RIPE Policy Proposals on www.ripe.net:https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/current-proposals/current-policy-proposals


We look forward to your involvement in the PDP.


Kind regards,


Marco Schmidt

RIPE Policy Development Officer

RIPE NCC




===8<===========End of original message text===========







-- 


Ing. Riccardo Gori

e-mail: rgori@wirem.net

Mobile:  +39 339 8925947

Mobile:  +34 602 009 437

Profile: https://it.linkedin.com/in/riccardo-gori-74201943 

 

WIREM Fiber Revolution

Net-IT s.r.l.

Via Cesare Montanari, 2

47521 Cesena (FC)

Tel +39 0547 1955485

Fax +39 0547 1950285


--------------------------------------------------------------------

 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE

This message and its attachments are addressed solely to the persons 

above and may contain confidential information. If you have received 

the message in error, be informed that any use of the content hereof 

is prohibited. Please return it immediately to the sender and delete 

the message. Should you have any questions, please contact us by re-

plying to info@wirem.net

        Thank you

WIREM - Net-IT s.r.l.Via Cesare Montanari, 2 - 47521 Cesena (FC)

--------------------------------------------------------------------