Hi list, I support this proposal. It's seems logical and needed modify. Simple and easy clarification to avoid misunderstading in interpretation. Well done thank you Max. I realized that I was proposing sort of this to one of my customers just before summer season 2016 for beach side public wifi. Project postponed to summer season 2017 for technical reasons. I would copy the "Contractual requirements" under "New Policy Text" since like this seems to be part of the modify. regards Riccardo Il 21/10/2016 10:15, Marco Schmidt ha scritto:
Dear colleagues,
A new RIPE Policy proposal 2016-04, "IPv6 PI Sub-assignment Clarification" is now available for discussion.
The goal of this proposal is to define sub-assignments in IPv6 PI assignments as subnets of /64 and shorter.
You can find the full proposal at:
https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2016-04
We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to <address-policy-wg@ripe.net> before 21 November 2016.
Regards,
Marco Schmidt Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC
Sent via RIPE Forum -- https://www.ripe.net/participate/mail/forum
-- Riccardo Gori