Re: [address-policy-wg] Revised 2006-01 set back to Discussion Phase (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)

On 25 Nov 2008, at 18:20, Nick Hilliard wrote:

Ana Matic wrote:

...

We encourage you to review this policy proposal and send your comments to <address-policy-wg@ripe.net> before 23 December 2008.

I support this proposal.

- while a requirement for multihoming is useful, it should be made clear during implementation that this is not necessarily a requirement for multihoming using ASNs and BGP on the public Internet

I agree with Nick. Andy