Dear Sergiu,

about your example and its eventual realtionship with the proposal 2015-05:
Company X would have not limit in receive address space as described in transfert or allocation policies.
The limit described in 2015-05 would be applied to the LIR that assigned space to Company X and, as described in your example, later transfered the space in Company X registry.
This LIR is supposed to not need address space as it moved it outside its registry so it would not be able to request an additional /22 allocation from pool outside 185/8 standing on 2015-05 proposal

On the other hand if Company X after its sing up as a new LIR after 18 months need more space and there is enough space outside 185/8  would be able to request an additional /22 standing on  2015-05 proposal. The LIR that offered the first /22 to Company X as  "assigned resource" could also request an additional /22 allocation if its registry is holding less than a /20 IPv4.

hope this help

regards

Riccardo


Il 29/04/2016 10:38, Sergiu IANCIUC ha scritto:
hello,

PLS, take in consideration the situation

Company  X  has  a  /22 from its LIR. The LIR can not offer more IPv4 
spaces   and the Company X becomes a LIR to satisfy its needs. Now, it 
is logical that the LIR (if agreed between these 2 LIRs) transfers the 
space  allocated  to the Company X (now the new LIR) AND THIS have to 
not be the part from the policy -

"requirements,  such  as  the LIR has not transferred any IPv4 address 
space before."

What are you thinking about?


Best Regards,


-
Sergiu IANCIUC
SC ITNS.NET SRL


MD-2068, Moldova
or. Chisinau, str. Miron Costin 3/1
tel.: +373 22 877 877
fax : +373 22 44 11 73
mobile: +373 690 22 111
url: http://www.itns.md


Save a tree... Don't print this email unless you have to...








This is a forwarded message
From: Marco Schmidt <mschmidt@ripe.net>
To: ncc-announce@ripe.net
Date: Friday, April 29, 2016, 11:18:23 AM
Subject: [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE Policy Proposals - April Update


===8<==============Original message text===============
Dear colleagues,

Here is our monthly overview of open policy proposals and their stage in 
the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP).

If you wish to join the discussion about a particular proposal, please 
do so on the relevant working group mailing list.

Proposals Open for Discussion:
2015-05, "Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria"

Proposals Awaiting Input:
2015-04, "RIPE Resource Transfer Policies"
2016-01, "Include Legacy Internet Resource Holders in the Abuse-c Policy"


Proposal Overviews:

PROPOSAL: 2015-05, "Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria"
OVERVIEW: Aims to allow LIRs to request an additional /22 IPv4 
allocation from the RIPE NCC every 18 months. The latest version of the 
proposal suggests several requirements, such as the LIR cannot hold more 
than a /20 IPv4, must document their IPv6 deployment and has not 
transferred any IPv4 address space before.
STATUS: Discussion Phase
WHERE TO COMMENT: Address Policy Working Group: address-policy-wg@ripe.net
DEADLINE: 13 May 2016
FULL PROPOSAL: https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2015-05

=====

The following proposals are awaiting input before they can go any 
further in the PDP.

PROPOSAL: 2015-04, "RIPE Resource Transfer Policies"
OVERVIEW: Aims to create a single transfer policy with all relevant 
information on the transfer of Internet number resources, replacing text 
in several RIPE Policies. The proposal also introduces a 24-month 
holding period for IPv4 addresses and 16-bit ASNs after any change of 
holdership.
RIPE NCC IMPACT ANALYSIS: Includes the point how the 24-month holding 
period for scarce resources will be applied.
STATUS: Review Phase – Awaiting decision from working group chair
FULL PROPOSAL: https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2015-04

PROPOSAL: 2016-01, "Include Legacy Internet Resource Holders in the 
Abuse-c Policy"
OVERVIEW: Aims for a mandatory abuse contact for Legacy Internet 
Resource holders in the RIPE Database.
STATUS: Discussion Phase – Awaiting decision from proposer
FULL PROPOSAL: https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2016-01


The RIPE NCC provides an overview of current RIPE Policy Proposals on 
www.ripe.net:
https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/current-proposals/current-policy-proposals

We look forward to your involvement in the PDP.

Kind regards,

Marco Schmidt
RIPE Policy Development Officer
RIPE NCC



===8<===========End of original message text===========

-- 
Ing. Riccardo Gori
e-mail: rgori@wirem.net
Mobile:  +39 339 8925947
Mobile:  +34 602 009 437
Profile: https://it.linkedin.com/in/riccardo-gori-74201943

WIREM Fiber Revolution
Net-IT s.r.l.
Via Cesare Montanari, 2
47521 Cesena (FC)
Tel +39 0547 1955485
Fax +39 0547 1950285

--------------------------------------------------------------------
	CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This message and its attachments are addressed solely to the persons 
above and may contain confidential information. If you have received 
the message in error, be informed that any use of the content hereof 
is prohibited. Please return it immediately to the sender and delete 
the message. Should you have any questions, please contact us by re-
plying to info@wirem.net
        Thank you
WIREM - Net-IT s.r.l.Via Cesare Montanari, 2 - 47521 Cesena (FC)
--------------------------------------------------------------------