I support both the proposal and the suggestion on fast-tracking. +1 /Ragnar On 30.10.12 16:31, "Tore Anderson" <tore.anderson@redpill-linpro.com> wrote:
Hi,
I invite everyone that supports this proposal to publicly say so by posting a message to the list, so that the proposal will hopefully be fast-tracked by the WG chairs.
* Emilio Madaio
The draft document for the version 2.0 of the policy proposal 2010-06,"Revert 'Run Out Fairly'" has been published. The impact analysis that was conducted for this proposal has also been published.
I have a small nit to pick with the impact analysis, which says:
The allocation and assignment periods will no longer be three months. Said periods will become: [...] - For assignments: 24 months.
That is not what the proposal says. It makes no mention of 24 months anywhere. What it does say, is:
Assignments¹ immediate utilisation should be at least 25% of the assigned space. After one year, this should be at least 50% of the space unless special circumstances are defined.
Therefore, if the end user's usage is increasing exponentially over time, his maximum assignment period will be less than 24 months.
On the other hand, if the end user's usage is increasing at a slower and slower pace over time, his maximum assignment period will be longer than 24 months.
In any case, the text in question is the exact same as it used to be before Run Out Fairly was implemented.
Best regards, -- Tore Anderson Redpill Linpro AS - http://www.redpill-linpro.com