I can't remain indifferent to such interesting proposal :) So I have to continue (no matter has it formal impact or not). 25.04.2015, 16:28, "Gert Doering" <gert@space.net>:
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 04:22:15PM +0300, Vladimir Andreev wrote:
I think you mix "preventing making profit" and "assure available IPv4 space to new entrants".
As I calculated (and presented my results some days ago) reselling has low impact on IPv4 exhaustion.
So the only reason (as I see it) is just to prevent earning money.
Therefore I have reasonable question: why do some members worry about someone's profit?
Because it's a common good, and not there to further individual members' profit. Or, as your mother might have said every now and then, "just imagine what happens if everyone did this".
But you can stop this discussion now.
First, because it happens outside the formal process anyway, so whatever is said is not relevant for the proposal anyway.
Second, because you've made your point fairly clear.
Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-- With best regards, Vladimir Andreev General director, QuickSoft LLC Tel: +7 903 1750503