I just hear I can't use IPv6 PI network for hosting service. And I want to talk about it ;)
Where did you hear this? I just looked at section 8 of RIPE-472 and there is nothing mentioned there.
Yes, a few hosters I know are big companies, LIRs, trade their traffic and so on. But majority are small companines have from one server to one-two racks of hosting servers. They will never become a LIR only for [useless now] IPv6 address space. But they host a huge piece of resources need by a lot of regular users.
Yes, this is true.
So I think we should ASAP change IPv6 PI policy to let hosting be the issue for IPv6 PI assignment.
I don't see any problem with IPv6 PI and I don't understand what you want to change. Please tell us which document to change, and provide a suggestion for the new words to put in the document. --Michael Dillon