Leo Vegoda wrote:
On 02/12/2008 11:48, "Randy Bush" <randy@psg.com> wrote:
I can only second Niels here. While organizing conferences and events with network infrastructure myself, I can tell that it is a hassle to re-arrange temporary PI every time... so I do see the incentive. But why should the NCC be a special case and no one else?
Elisa Jasinska wrote: perhaps someone could phrase the general case?
I thought 2006-01 is the general case. If it's not, I'd appreciate an explanation of why it cannot be.
i suspect that the ncc, perhaps andrei, would be the one to answer this, not i. but i can see having a meeting net address (4 and 6) and asn set lying around for folk to use, with some way to grab/schedule the token for two weeks (one setup and one show). randy