..or you can file a proposal to change the current policy. You’re very obviously trying to solve a problem and I don’t disagree that the problem exists; I just don’t like the proposed solution.

Remco


On 15-04-09 11:06, "Bartek Gajda" <gajda@man.poznan.pl> wrote:

Remco van Mook wrote:
>
> I’m sorry but that goes back to my previous e-mail – a request for an
> AS is a request for an AS and I don’t see how that should be related
> in any way to address space. What this achieves is the same level of
> fragmentation of the IPv6 space, but then in /32 blocks instead of
> /33, /34 and /35s. I don’t see what the wider community gains here. If
> you need more space, request a larger block. If your issue is that
> some people filter smaller than /32 announcements then try to solve that.
So what about is the current policy?
You want to give some LIRs additional /32 because:
"According to the IPv6 policy an IPv6 allocation must be announced as
one prefix. Therefore, an organization operating four separate networks
with one /32 IPv6 allocation cannot de-aggregate into for example a /34
route announcement per network."
And here you are suggesting me to de-agradate my allocation which this
proposal trying to avoid! Doesn't  it looks like one can get what he or
she wants but the other "can de-agraaate"??

Bartek

> It’s not like the global IPv6 routing table is going to explode any
> time soon.
>
> Personally I think IPv6 is going to be a runaway success by the time
> the DFZ hits 10,000 routes – filtering more specifics I can see the
> reason for, filtering smaller announcements I can not.
>
> Remco
>
>
> On 15-04-09 10:46, "Piotr Strzyzewski" <Piotr.Strzyzewski@polsl.pl> wrote:
>
>     On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:35:01AM +0200, Remco van Mook wrote:
>     >
>     > Hang on a second. This is now devolving into a proposal where you
>     can get a
>     > separate AS and /32 for every customer your LIR serves and I will
>     definitely
>     > not support that. I want a pony, too.
>
>     Correct me if I'm wrong, but allocation's goes to LIRs and not to
>     customers. Moreover, AS'es are owned by clearly distinguished
>     "entities".
>     We could add those two things together and make that like: /32 for
>     every
>     AS owned by LIR (in simplification).
>
>     Piotr
>
>     --
>     gucio -> Piotr Strzyżewski
>     E-mail: Piotr.Strzyzewski@polsl.pl
>
>
>
> This email is from Equinix Europe Limited or one of its
> associated/subsidiary companies. This email, and any files transmitted
> with it, contains information which is confidential, may be legally
> privileged and is solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you
> have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete
> this email immediately.  Equinix Europe Limited. Registered Office:
> Quadrant House, Floor 6, 17 Thomas More Street, Thomas More Square,
> London E1W 1YW. Registered in England and Wales No. 6293383.
>