On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 03:48:05PM +0200, Ahmed Abu-Abed wrote:
I am new to the Address Policy WG and this seems like quite an old discussion. I endorse assigning a /32 to LIRs regardless of the IPv6 access method they use.
Uh, what exactly are we discussing here?
Just to make this very clear:
Any RIPE LIR can get a /32 IPv6 PA right away, just by asking.
Only if you want *multiple* /32, or "bigger than a /32", this is where it gets tricky (multiple distinct /32s are not possible under the current policy, "bigger than a /32" needs documentation that you have the necessary amount of customers).
Gert Doering -- APWG chair
Yes Agreed. I am against the idea, that 6RD deployment automatically grant another /32 allocation. Best Regards, Janos