Hi, On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 03:24:55PM +0200, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
On Fri, 6 May 2011, ABS EMEA NIC - IPA Support AT&T wrote:
Why do you think: "50 EUR PI with no technical requirements for multihoming or other is a recipe for longterm disaster in my book." ? 50 Eur works today for IPv4 PI space as well.
As far as I know there is still multihoming requirement for IPv4 PI.
No. Never was. http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-509#----pa-vs--pi-address-space The IPv6 PI policy that we currently have is significantly more restrictive than the IPv4 PI policy, specifically because the working group at that time decided that we don't know whether the routing table will explode. We still don't know, but given that IPv4 PI is much less restrictive, IPv4 PI is only contributing 21% of the BGP routes in the RIPE region, and the restrictive IPv6 PI policy is holding up deployment plans, people are asking to get this changed. Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- did you enable IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279