On 12 Jun 2007, at 22:23, Joao Damas wrote:
I think we have a well defined policy on what to do when someone needs some PI in order to run an Anycasted DNS service. We set out a family of requirements based on geographic diversity, for instance, that clearly states what should be in place when a request for PI for DNS use is made. They could also state their case in this wg. Sounds far more reasonable.
I disagree; its not reasonable for someone to have to state their case for why they need resources on a -wg mailing list. A sponsoring LIR should perform the function of deciding whether an application is appropriate. I'm simply suggesting that there's a hole in current policy (or is there ? Does this resource requirement get covered by 'PI needed to multihome'), that we can look to fill with this real world example. Andy