On 01.04.10 14:36, Nick Hilliard wrote:
Number: 2010-01 Policy Proposal Name: Revoke and Re-assign Fairly Author: Nick Hilliard, INEX Proposal Version: 1.0 Submission Date: 1 April 2010 Current Phase: Discussion - Open for Discussion Phase ends/ended: 1 April 2010 Latest Status: Initial Community Discussion Suggested WG for Discussion and Publication: Address Policy Proposal Type: New Policy Term: Indefinite Policy Documents to be Affected: * IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment Procedures for the RIPE NCC Service Region (ripe-492)
this proposal is typical of the over-regulation in recent RIPE policies and adds unnecessary complexity to the working environment of network operators. Since network operators cannot remember what they had for breakfast or which shoe fits on which foot, let alone numbers larger than 10, revoking all IPv4 allocations and assignments would create confusion and hurting brains at LIRs all over Europe and Japan because network operators would need to learn new numbers. I for one oppose this proposal, especially since IPv4 will never run out now that we have end to end transparent NAT. And now excuse me, I have to attend to my pony and my helmet. Marcus -- man-da.de GmbH, AS8365 Phone: +49 6151 16-6956 Petersenstr. 30 Fax: +49 6151 16-3050 D-64287 Darmstadt e-mail: ms@man-da.de Geschäftsführer Marcus Stögbauer AG Darmstadt, HRB 94 84