On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 07:25:42PM +0200, Andre Keller wrote:correct...
If my interpretation of the IA is correct, the retroactive part is
restricted to evaluation of transfer requests. It means if/once the
policy is implemented, it applies to resources already allocated by RIPE
NCC but not yet transferred. Resources already transferred wont be
affected. I think this is a sensible approach.
Your interpretation is the same as mine, correct or not ;) The
crux is, though: it changes ripe-623, the "IPv4 Address
Allocation and Assignment Policies for the RIPE NCC Service
Region" document, not a hypothetical "Transfer Policies"
document.
This sets a precedent for changing *everything else* inThis has already happened before (remember 2007-01?) and it happens with every change of policy..
this document and applying the changes retrospectively.
I can't be the only one who does not want to go there?I understand what you mean but, seriously, this will affect (based on the IA) a maximum of 580 /22s (and for a period of 1 day to 2 years depending on the date the allocation would be received vs policy implementation).
regards,
rgds,
Sascha Luck
Elvis Daniel VeleaChief Executive Officer Email: elvis@V4Escrow.net |
|
Recognised IPv4 Broker/Facilitator in: |
|
This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original.Any other use of this email is strictly prohibited. |