15 Apr
2009
15 Apr
'09
2:04 p.m.
On 15 Apr 2009, at 10:57, Jerzy Pawlus wrote:
*Andy,
Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs
I do not support this proposal. If an org (LIR or not) needs a separate address block for routing reasons, then this should be catered for through the PI policy.
PA should be aggregatable. There's a clue in the name. ;-)
And guess what is more scalable. PI per client or PA per AS.
If I read this as "routing table slots per client" or "routing table slots per AS" then the two are broadly equivalent... Andy PS, I would like a pony too.