Hi Jeroen, There is no way in the PDP to "freeze" a discussion. In fact keeping the discussion period extended, and just not being pro-active in the discussion may act as a way to "freeze" it, and that's what I'm trying, but emails like this don't help that path. IANA is just one choice, and as I don't agree is the best one, this is why I'm proposing this policy. When the next version of the ID is released, then you will see an update of the current policy proposal text. Regards, Jordi
De: Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org> Organización: Unfix Responder a: <address-policy-wg-admin@ripe.net> Fecha: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:48:00 +0100 Para: <address-policy-wg@ripe.net> CC: <policy-announce@ripe.net> Asunto: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2007-05 Discussion Period extended until 9 July 2007 (IPv6 ULA-Central)
Filiz Yilmaz wrote:
PDP Number: 2007-05 IPv6 ULA-Central
Dear Colleagues
The Discussion Period for the proposal described in 2007-05 has been extended until 9 July 2007.
As the IETF is re-addressing this issue at the moment, I suggest that until they are done re-analyzing and coming to a conclusion that this submission is frozen till that work is done and completed.
There are various suggestions already that it might be very possible that IANA directly will provide this service. Next to the more likely result that ULA-C won't even exist due to the many concerns raised already by various operators in the community.
Please FREEZE this proposal till all that work is done.
Greets, Jeroen
********************************************** The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org Bye 6Bone. Hi, IPv6 ! http://www.ipv6day.org This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.