gert@space.net (Gert Doering) wrote:
This is supposed to be fixed by the "anycast policy proposal", which is in the works (proposed by Andreas Baess, and being delayed since months because Andreas was distracted by things like IDN domains).
So it's inhouse. Unfortunately, Andreas is on holiday, but I am confident he'll push this forward as soon as he's back. I was under the wrong assumption, the paper had already been submitted...
Please don't intermix "generic PI to end-users", "IPv6 multihoming", "critical infrastructure" and "ancast address space" issues - it will just create a very blurred picture, where everybody is argueing about something else.
Well, this is a v6 multihoming, critical (isn't everybody?), anycasting end-user... it actually _is_ intermixed and blurry. Oh, and regarding Iljitsch: The root/*tld server operators unfortunately can't force anyone to use EDNS0 compatible software. In theory, everything's simple. Elmar. -- "Begehe nur nicht den Fehler, Meinung durch Sachverstand zu substituieren." (PLemken, <bu6o7e$e6v0p$2@ID-31.news.uni-berlin.de>) --------------------------------------------------------------[ ELMI-RIPE ]---