If it does, then they should look into other solutions such as renumbering each time they switch upstream provider instead of externalising the cost to the rest of the world. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marginal_cost#Externalities> Thank you for your link, I appreciate your help in this issue...
You're seriously saying 2EUR per year per customer (1000 customers) breaks their back? Try to explain it to them. You don't understand that few thousands of ISPs are using PI IPv4 and your policy limitation will not change their behaviour. You had to forbid PI IPv4 to end-users in the past, but not to make some prohibitions in the IPv6 policy.
Regarding filtering IPv6 prefixes I agree with Daniel Suchy, I think there will be a lot of people (let's say 99% ?:-)) who will not do it. best regards, Alex Vishnyakov On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> wrote:
On Tue, 3 May 2011, Alex Vishnyakov wrote:
It's your mistake that you don't care, because it's not just my issue - I can bring here to this discussion more then 1000 ISPs from Russia and Ukraine, who are using PIs IPv4 now and want to move to IPv6 technology, but cannot, because of the policy and people like you, and then it will become very quickly a global issue. Or 1000 of ISPs is still a small number for you ? It's more than million potential IPv6 users, content servers etc.
You're seriously saying 2EUR per year per customer (1000 customers) breaks their back?
If it does, then they should look into other solutions such as renumbering each time they switch upstream provider instead of externalising the cost to the rest of the world.
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marginal_cost#Externalities>
-- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se