On 8/8/11 12:51 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 06/08/2011 11:42, Erik Bais wrote:
In short, the policy proposal is to remove the multi-homing requirement for PI IPv6. Currently, companies can become a LIR and get IPv6, with no multi-home requirement, same with requesting IPv4 PI.
I don't support this policy as it stands, because it makes it too easy to get PI space instead of PA space. This will cause deaggregation in the ipv6 DFZ.
Deaggregation is a serious operational issue which gets monotonically worse over time. It never improves, and 2011-02 will simply aggravate the problem.
the best solution then is to give IPv6 space to nobody, so routing tabe does not deagregate and grow beyond memory limits :) Joke aside, if enterprises and mid-sized companies can get IPv6 PI without multihoming requirements and this means this lowers the need of NAT66 - I'm all for it. If we think multihoming requirement is a speed-bump for folx requesting IPv6 space, remove it. Maybe we could charge more for PI that does not show multihoming and usual price for PI that does multihoming. Cheers, Jan