On Sun, 21 Sep 2014, Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 11:48:15AM +0200, Roger Jørgensen wrote:
That still leave the issue if it's a good idea for each WG to have their own procedures of selecting chairs, or if there should be one common for all. Guess that's for the entire community and not this working group to discuss ?
Given the history of this, I'd really like to postpone *that* question until we have some tangible results of what all the WGs individually agreed to. If it turns out that the effective differences are just wording details, we can go for a round of word-smithing these variants into one generic version - and if it turns out that people really want fundamentally different policies (like "fixed upper limit to the number of terms a given chair can service" vs. "as long as the WG is happy with him"), we'll see - maybe other WGs want to learn and adopt, maybe we just accept the fact that the WGs and the WGs' constituencys are just different.
I agree. Let evry WG solve the immediate problem (lack of procedure and transparency) for now and then we can have the other discussion in due time. Cheers, Daniel _________________________________________________________________________________ Daniel Stolpe Tel: 08 - 688 11 81 stolpe@resilans.se Resilans AB Fax: 08 - 55 00 21 63 http://www.resilans.se/ Box 45 094 556741-1193 104 30 Stockholm