27 Nov
2017
27 Nov
'17
1:32 p.m.
On 27 November 2017 at 12:26, Marco Schmidt <mschmidt@ripe.net> wrote:
Policy proposal 2016-04, "IPv6 Sub-assignment Clarification" is now in the extended Review Phase.
At the end of the Review Phase, the WG Chairs will determine whether the WG has reached rough consensus.
Hi, I support the policy goals and the amendments to the current policy The only open question I see is if the examples included in the wording are broad enough in terms of scope to enable a clear decision as to whether a "usage" is (or is not) a sub-assignment? For me it's clear but I'm a native bad english speaker and would appreciate confirmation from non-native speakers just to make sure Thx J <https://www.ripe.net/participate/mail/forum>