Re: [address-policy-wg] 2016-04 Review Phase (IPv6 Sub-assignment Clarification)

Hi Jordi,

I think Jan comments (in the meeting, hopefully he can repeat here) are very relevant, and I’ve a draft policy proposal in that direction, I’m waiting for my co-author review to submit it.

If you are talking about a RIPE policy proposal: please don't. Having multiple "competing" policy proposals on the same subject active at the same time tends to make it impossible to get consensus on anything. If you want to contribute please work with the current policy proposer. The end goal should be working group consensus, so getting consensus with the current proposer on the next version should only be a small effort in that direction :) Cheers, Sander