Re: [address-policy-wg] 2015-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Assessment Criteria for IPv6 Initial Allocation Size)

On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 12:02:31PM +0000, Silvia Hagen wrote:

So let's go for balance :-)

I agree. I think a sensible balance may be that allocations >/29 are reviewed (as they are now, AIUI) by the IPRA managers and/or the Board. There is a danger, in my opinion, that the IPv6 allocation/assignment process is infested with "IPv4 thinking" which will result in SPs employing "workarounds" of the sort that made IPv4 such a pain to deal with. That said, I've done a bit of v6 IPAM recently and the numbers one deals with are staggering. ;p rgds, Sascha Luck