Hi Garry, second all of this... garry@nethinks.com (Garry Glendown) wrote:
- /48, not /56 - small yearly fee (100-200€?) for routable PI - small one-time fee (100-200€?) for non-routable PI (take them out of a defined /32 or so which is/can/should be filtered by ISPs) - don't automatically distribute IPv6 space (both PI and LIRs) - e.g., our customers with PI I don't see using IPv6 within at least the next 5 years (we've had v6 available for several years ...). Instead, make initial v6 applications and allocations "painless", allowing for any PI owners to just "lift their hand" and they receive their v6-PI (/48) for just paying ;)
...but: Don't forget the LIRs-that-have-no-customers, please. We're in this peculiar situation: We are heavily multihomed in v4 but cannot get any v6; we have to make do with an assignment from one of our transits and agreements with the others to carry that assignment separately (and not filter it). Yours, Elmi. -- "Hinken ist kein Mangel eines Vergleichs, sondern sollte als wesentliche Eigenschaft von Vergleichen angesehen werden." (Marius Fränzel in desd) --------------------------------------------------------------[ ELMI-RIPE ]---