So I think plain "+1" should not be also considered valuable. 09.06.2015, 23:27, "Gert Doering" <gert@space.net>:
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 08:01:29PM +0000, Borhan Habibi wrote:
I oppose this proposal as it cannot solve thrpe problem
-1 to this proposal
I find it quite interesting to see so many people show up today (on the very last day of the review phase) that have never been seen on the APWG list before, voicing "-1" without any more specific reasoning.
Folks, we are not voting here. So it does not help to bring all your friends to post a "-1". Come up with arguments.
Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-- With best regards, Vladimir Andreev General director, QuickSoft LLC Tel: +7 903 1750503