28 Oct
2020
28 Oct
'20
2:16 p.m.
On 28 Oct 2020, at 12:05, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg <address-policy-wg@ripe.net> wrote:
However, in RIPE NCC, if you created several LIRs for getting more IPv4 allocations, *even if you don't use/need it* you can get (and thus stockpile) IPv6 *at no extra cost*.
I clearly think this is not a good thing.
Why? What actual problems is this alleged stockpiling causing? Is there any v6 stockpiling taking place? Why would anyone need/want to stockpile v6 when the *lowest* allocation they’d get gives them orders of magnitude more address space than they could ever hope to use. I think the onus is on you to provide a clear problem statement before making policy proposals. It’s not at all clear there’s an actual problem to solve.