14 Nov
2011
14 Nov
'11
10:55 p.m.
Hi Roger, Roger Jørgensen wrote: [...]
It is not that I disagree on that /29 is a good size... but, just to repeat myself and some others.
Why are we doing this step by step all over again? Last we went from /35 to /32, now we go from /32 to /29. I guess the next time we'll be talking about this topic is around 2015-2017... Why not do it properly this time around? Like a /26 or so? We got plenty of address space to burn really....
Where does the /26 come from? Or to put it another way, assuming the basis for allocation policy is justified need, what need is considered so universal that no justification is required? Regards, Leo Vegoda