On Wed, 14 Aug 2013, Jim Reid wrote:
IIUC, in these cases the NCC generally tries to take a more pragmatic approach.
Well, that didn't seem to happen in this case.
Surely there's somebody at the original company who can put something in writing to confirm that the address space moved when the network was transferred all those years ago?
*sigh*. Yes, that is the stance RIPE NCC has taken it seems. And when that person who *surely* exists can't be produced or won't sign because they know nothing about this, the space will be reclaimed.
For all we know an officer of that company might have been in contact with the NCC and told a different story from the one given by the current user of the space.
Speculation doesn't really help. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se