5 Jan
2012
5 Jan
'12
2:35 p.m.
Gert wrote:
Looking at all the messages that have been posted in the discussions following my e-mails, I categorize your feedback as follows: [...] - statements of "we do not have consensus" (Immo Wehrenberg, on the assumption that consensus has to be unanimous Remco Van Mook)
I'm afraid I have to correct you here. I said that I'm not sure wether we have consensous or not and i would follow Gezas opinion on that. Since Geza has not objected that consensous is reached, I assume that we have consensous now. Just a clarification, sorry that I did not make this clear in the first place. Immo