On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 11:04:05PM +0200, Sander Steffann wrote:
It will take some time (it can be done in about 10 weeks) to do this should the need ever occur, but as this is a last-resort exit strategy I think this is acceptable. Is this an acceptable solution for everybody?
the absolute minimum I would accept is a sunset clause (ie the policy will run to a fixed date (say 2 years away) and will not be in force unless explicitly prorogued thereafter)
And I would really like to get a solution for this problem, because I am much more afraid of IPv4 address space hijacks once the NCC IPv4 pool runs out...
In my book that is an argument against it. Anything that prolongs the IPv4 pain, especially at the cost of having a censorship infrastructure imposed on *all* internet routing (not just v4) can't be good... rgds, s.