Hi Gert, I fully aggree with your arguments this time. Best, Geza On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote:
Hi,
You can find the full proposal at: https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2011-05 Please e-mail any final comments about this proposal to address-policy-wg@ripe.net before 9 May 2012.
I have 1 question before the last-call ends tomorrow. . .
In the grand scheme of things and also seeing the other policies popping up for trying to divide whatever is going to be left from the final /8.
If we all think that this reservation is a good thing for the good of
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 11:23:17AM +0200, Erik Bais wrote: the internet ... (And I agree on the reasoning) is reserving only a /16 from the final /8 enough?
65k /24's are in the last /8 ... and for future IXP's we 'only' reserve
a /16 (256 /24's )
I would rather see that increased to a /14 if possible.
Formally, we can't change anything "just so" at this point in the PDP - so we'd have to go back to review phase, draft a new policy text, and then re-do review phase and last call.
If you think this is important enough, please formally voice "strong and sustained opposition" - which is what it takes to bounce the proposal back to review phase.
OTOH, since this came from the EIX WG, I think they have a pretty good idea on the number of IXPs to be expected world-wide, and how much growth to expect there over the next 5-10 years. Since they seem to be happy with the proposal as it stands, with a /16, and the constraints that this brings with it (= 256 new small IXPs, or 128 new IXPs with a /23, etc.), I would prefer to accept their assumptions and go forward.
Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279