23 Sep
2011
23 Sep
'11
3:31 p.m.
On 23/09/2011 14:24, Sander Steffann wrote:
Someone suggested to include such documentation in IPv6 PI requests. Because this is not actually a policy change (it doesn't change if someone gets the address space or not) but an implementation issue we decided to add it as a note to the RIPE NCC.
I certainly suggested it as a policy possibility:
http://www.ripe.net/ripe/maillists/archives/address-policy-wg/2011/msg00820....
Not sure if others talked about it too. However, there is a substantial difference between "explicitly required to provide evidence" and "to ask for extensive documentation" - the former was suggested because it does materially change the policy. Nick