21 Oct
2010
21 Oct
'10
2:05 p.m.
On 21 October 2010 13:01, Nick Hilliard <nick@inex.ie> wrote:
On 21/10/2010 12:48, James Blessing wrote:
Either I'm going mental or doesn't the line:
"Cumulatively, no more than 248 additional IPv4 addresses may be assigned to any particular End User for the purposes outlined in section 6.10."
make the proposal completely pointless
In what regard?
"The RIPE NCC will assign additional IPv4 addresses to an End User in order to make the assignment size a multiple of a /24" Last time I looked /24 = 256 addresses Therefore you can't give a 'new' end user a /24 as they have no address space to return and 256 > 248. If it was 2048 then I could understand the logic... J -- James Blessing 07989 039 476