On Wed, 11 Feb 2015, Elvis Daniel Velea wrote:and this is the loophole this policy proposal wants to close. I have seen at least one example where an LIR was created, received a /22 and within a week sold it (and I suppose it also got closed just after that).
I'm waiting to get the feeling of the community on this proposal before starting a discussion on the members-discuss mailing list about the M&A procedure.
My gut feeling is that I do not want new LIRs created to acquire a /22, immediately transfer it out, and close the LIR. Considering the market price on IPv4 addresses I have seen and the cost of creating a LIR, this would be below market price.
Elvis Daniel VeleaChief Executive Officer Email: elvis@V4Escrow.net |
|
Recognised IPv4 Broker/Facilitator in: |
|
This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original.Any other use of this email is strictly prohibited. |