3 Apr
2012
3 Apr
'12
1:08 p.m.
On 04/03/2012 12:40 PM, Sascha Luck wrote:
there is nothing to understand.
well... err, probably right, i guess... ;)
I would assume that many (particularly smaller) LIRs are not using all the allocated space.
...which means that they do not reach the minimum allocation size - and therefore don't get an allocation? i'll stick with my understanding that this is simply 'what you get anyway' (i.e. handled as 'needed by definition')...
I am not aware of the NCC reclaiming unused parts of any allocation.
well then: *surprise* :)
while I don't really care about v4 anymore, I oppose it.
to get back to the point, yes, i (obviously) oppose 2012-01, too. regards, Chris